Intergenerational Preferences on the Attributes of Local Political Candidates

Authors

  • LOVELY PRINCESS ACOSTA n/a Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64358/jstgc.v2i1.9

Keywords:

Generation X, Generation Y, Generation Z, intergenerational voter preferences, local political candidates, candidate attributes

Abstract

Voter preferences play a critical role in shaping democratic practices, particularly in societies characterized by generational diversity. This study examines the key attributes prioritized by Generation X, Y, and Z voters in the four districts of Tuguegarao City in evaluating local political candidates, especially in the context of the upcoming 2025 National and Local Elections. Utilizing a convergent-parallel mixed-methods design, the research employed stratified random sampling for quantitative data and quota sampling for qualitative inputs, involving 120 respondents through structured questionnaires and follow-up in-depth interviews. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected concurrently, analyzed independently, and later integrated to develop a comprehensive understanding of generational electoral behavior. Findings reveal both shared and generation-specific preferences. Across all cohorts, voters consistently valued transformational leadership, crisis responsiveness, strong community communication, and conservative platform orientation. Personality was ranked as a secondary but influential attribute. However, educational attainment was not seen as a decisive criterion despite majority of the respondents are tertiary graduates. Candidates with humanities-based occupational backgrounds, and proven grassroots engagement were preferred. There was also a broad rejection of candidates closely aligned to candidates who graduated abroad, elementary and high school graduate, worked in entertainment industry, regularly use social media for projects, centralized leadership style, and focused on legislative accomplishments. Voters also emphasized economic policy relevance, and consistency in public service delivery. Variations in policy preferences, particularly on gender-related issues, further illustrate generational divides in political orientation in which generations reject liberal policy-oriented platforms. Generational differences, however, underscore the complexity of voter behavior. Generation X favored actionable platforms and party-aligned leadership, reflecting a pragmatic and conservative orientation and views experience as not a crucial basis for choosing a candidate. Generation Y prioritized political credibility, proven governance, and ethical consistency over ideological affiliation or public image. Generation Z valued educational background but demonstrated an ongoing struggle between progressive ideals and vulnerability to misinformation highlighting contradictions in digital activism and actual voting behavior.  These results suggest the necessity for political stakeholders to adapt campaign strategies and civic engagement efforts to resonate with both shared democratic values and the nuanced expectations of each generational group. By aligning political messaging and candidate development with generational priorities, more inclusive, credible, and effective local governance can be promoted.

References

Anabo, F.D. (2021). What Matters Most to Student Voters?. A Conjoint Analysis of Political Candidate Attributes. Philippine Social Science Journal. https.//doi.org/10.52006/main.v4i2.355

Anastacio, A., & Morandarte, N. (2023). Political patronage in Philippine local politics. A case study of Zamboanga City. SSRN. https.//papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4362736

Berz, J., & Jankowski, M. (2022). Local preferences in candidate selection. Evidence from a conjoint experiment among party leaders in Germany. Party Politics, 28, 1136 - 1149. https.//doi.org/10.1177/13540688211041770

Brug, W.V., & Franklin, M.N. (2018). Generational replacement. engine of electoral change. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315712390-35/generational-replacement-wouter-van-der-brug-mark-franklin

Cruz, C., Keefer, P., Labonne, J., & Trebbi, F. (2018). Making Policies Matter. Voter Responses to Campaign Promises. Randomized Social Experiments eJournal. https.//doi.org/10.3386/W24785

Fisher, P. (2023). The Contemporary Generations in American Politics. Society, 60(4), 492–500. https.//doi.org/10.1007/s12115-023-00849-6

Funtanilla, C. J. (2025, February 10). Millennials and Gen Z dominate 2025 Philippine elections, comprising 63% of voters - Tutubi News Magazine. Tutubi News Magazine. https.//tutubi.ph/millennials-and-gen-z-dominate-2025-philippine-elections-comprising-63-of-voters/

George, T. (2023). Scribbr. Retrieved June 22, 2023, from https.//www.scribbr.com/methodology/mixed-methods-research/

Hicken, A., Aspinall, E., & Weiss, M.L. (2019). Electoral Dynamics in the Philippines. https.//doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv136c5vg

Locus, S. (2024). Voters for Eleksyon 2025 now at 68M —Comelec. GMA News Online. https.//www.gmanetwork.com/news/topstories/nation/925886/voters-for-2025-eleksyon-now-at-68m-comelec/story/

Mendoza, G.A., Ballar, K.J., Yap, J.K., & Imelda, D. (2022). Misinformed or Overconfident? Fake News and Youth Voting Likelihood in the Philippines. SSRN Electronic Journal. https.//doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4064584

Murcia, J. V. B., & Bolo, R. L. T. (2017). Millennial voters’ preference for the 2016 Philippine presidential elections. A simulation using conjoint analysis. SSRN. Retrieved from https.//papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2983023

Nemčok, M., & Wass, H. (2021). Generations and Political Engagement. https.//doi.org/10.1093/ACREFORE/9780190228637.013.1756

Perrett, S., & Baldassarri, D. (2024). A generational shift. how partisan alignment and the rise of social issues have produced a generation of democrats. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties. https.//doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2024.2364734

Ravanilla, N., Davidson, M., & Hicken, A. (2022). Voting in Clientelistic Social Networks. Evidence From the Philippines*. Comparative Political Studies, 55, 1663 - 1697. https.//doi.org/10.1177/00104140211060275

Sidel, J.T. (2018). Patrons, bosses, dynasties, and reformers in local politics. https.//doi.org/10.4324/9781315709215-2

Strauss, W., & Howe, N. (1997). The fourth turning. An American prophecy. Broadway Books. Retrieved from https.//books.google.com/books/about/The_Fourth_Turning.html?id=d8bBFGJq79sC

Timoteo Jr., E.N. (2021). Millennial votes in the 2019 Philippine National Election. A quantitative approach. Applied Quantitative Analysis.https.//doi.org/10.31098/quant.558

Velasco, Joseph. (2024). The Digital Dynamics of Political Engagement Among Filipino Youth. Examining Participation in Social Media Platforms. Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities. 32. 1051-1071. 10.47836/pjssh.32.3.12.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-20