THE IMPACT OF SUSTAINABLE LIVELIHOOD PROGRAM IN UPLIFTING PANTAWID PAMILYANG PILIPINO PROGRAM (4Ps) HOUSEHOLD   AND SHAPING INCLUSIVE POLICY

Authors

  • JEHAN ECLEO KEYATEN Apayao State College Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64358/jstgpa.v2i2.68

Keywords:

Sustainable Livelihood Program, Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program, Micro-enterprise Development, Sustainable Livelihood Framework, Geographically Isolated Communities, Livelihood Resilience

Abstract

This study examined the perceived contributions and implementation experiences of Sustainable Livelihood Program Association (SLPA)-facilitated Micro-Enterprise Development initiatives among Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps) beneficiaries in geographically isolated and disadvantaged areas (GIDA) in Conner, Apayao. Using a descriptive mixed-methods design, data were gathered from forty (40) purposively selected beneficiaries participating in Sustainable Livelihood Program Associations under the Micro-Enterprise Development track. Results revealed generally positive perceptions regarding livelihood participation, financial management practices, organizational engagement, and access to institutional support mechanisms. Respondents associated SLPA participation with increased income-generating opportunities, improved coping capacity during financial difficulties, and support for household and educational needs. However, livelihood gains were commonly experienced as gradual and supplemental rather than immediately stable household income. Qualitative findings further identified market limitations, transportation difficulties, procedural delays, logistical constraints, and coordination concerns affecting livelihood operations within geographically isolated communities. Viewed through the Sustainable Livelihood Framework, the study findings suggest that livelihood implementation within GIDA settings is shaped by institutional processes, vulnerability conditions, and access to livelihood resources.

References

Abhijit Banerjee, Duflo, E., Goldberg, N., Karlan, D., Osei, R., Parienté, W., Shapiro, J., Thuysbaert, B., & Udry, C. (2015). A multifaceted program causes lasting progress for the very poor: Evidence from six countries. Science, 348(6236), 1260799. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1260799

Asian Development Bank. (2019). Microfinance for the poor in Asia: Policies and practices. Asian Development Bank.

Ballesteros, M. M., Orbeta, A. C., Jr., Corpus, J. P., & Ancheta, J. (2018). Assessment of implementation issues and livelihood success on the Sustainable Livelihood Program of the DSWD. Philippine Institute for Development Studies.

Blattman, C., & Ralston, L. (2015). Generating employment in poor and fragile states: Evidence from labor market and entrepreneurship programs. World Bank Research Observer, 30(2), 237–269. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lku012

Cauntongan, S. H. M. (2024). Assessing entrepreneurial capability of Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps) beneficiaries through Sustainable Livelihood Program microenterprise development in Butuan City, Philippines. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research.

Chambers, R., & Conway, G. (1992). Sustainable rural livelihoods: Practical concepts for the 21st century. Institute of Development Studies. Available from IDS OpenDocs.

Corpus, J. P., Ballesteros, M. M., & Orbeta, A. C., Jr. (2019). Socioeconomic profile of Sustainable Livelihood Program participants: Evidence from a household survey. Philippine Institute for Development Studies.

Department for International Development. (1999). Sustainable livelihoods guidance sheets. DFID.

Department of Social Welfare and Development. (2019). SLP impact evaluation report. DSWD.

Department of Social Welfare and Development. (2020). Sustainable Livelihood Program operations manual. DSWD.

Department of Social Welfare and Development. (2021). Sustainable Livelihood Program framework. DSWD.

Food and Agriculture Organization. (2018). Cash+ programmes: FAO’s approach. FAO.

International Fund for Agricultural Development. (2016). Rural development report: Fostering inclusive rural transformation. IFAD.

Kabeer, N. (1999). Resources, agency, achievements: Reflections on the measurement of women’s empowerment. Development and Change, 30(3), 435–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00125

Malanga, D. F., & Banda, M. (2021). ICT use and livelihoods of women microenterprises in Malawi.

National Economic and Development Authority. (2017). Philippine development plan 2017–2022. NEDA.

Orbeta, A. C., Jr., Ballesteros, M. M., Corpus, J. P. P., Paqueo, V. B., & Reyes, C. M. (2022). Evaluation of the Sustainable Livelihood Program’s Seed Capital Fund for Microenterprise Development. Philippine Institute for Development Studies.

Republic Act No. 11310. (2019). Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps) Act of 2019. Government of the Philippines.

Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Alfred A. Knopf.

United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. United Nations.

World Bank. (2018). The state of social safety nets 2018. World Bank.

World Bank. (2020). Philippines social protection review. World Bank.

World Bank. (2020). Poverty and shared prosperity 2020: Reversals of fortune. World Bank.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30